USPTO serial 75896691
ADLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A Thomas S Safford
A THOMAS S SAFFORD FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in the placement of advertising on a global communications network, both wireless and hard wired, including computer software for use in creating electronic advertisements for placement on wireless and hard wired global communications networks, and computer software for ruse in placing electronic advertisements for placement on wireless and hard wired global communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instruction manuals and related teaching materials in the field of advertising on wireless and hard wired global communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management; advertising services for others, namely the placement of advertising on wireless and hard wired global communications networks including with links to advertisers' web sites on such networks, and providing access to pre-arranged on-line web or wireless sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing electronic transmission of advertising over a global communications network, both wireless and hardwired, including to a selective network or pre-arranged on-line web or wireless sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Marketing advertising space to the business to business sector on wireless and hardwired global communications networks, namely electronic billboard advertising services, including banners, pop-ups, e-mails, microsites, textlinks, SMS, WAP; and computer programming services for others in support of advertising services for the business to business sector on wireless and hardwired global communications networks; in the nature of electronic billboard advertising services, including banners, pop-ups, e-mails, microsites, text links, SMS, and WAP | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1 & 1 Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KGaA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ADLINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |