Drawing for ALTAIR

USPTO serial 75896774

ALTAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005herbicides, fungicides, insecticides and acaricides for domestic, industrial, commercial and agricultural useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance