Drawing for E-EXTENDED ENTERPRISE

USPTO serial 75896939

E-EXTENDED ENTERPRISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-EXTENDED ENTERPRISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Coughlin

WILLIAM J COUGHLIN DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION800 CHRYSLER DR E CIMS 483-02-19AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326-2757UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR USE BY AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS, THEIR SUPPLIERS, SUPPLIER TIERS AND DEALER NETWORKS FOR THE PROPOSE OF UNIFYING AND EXTENDING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR SUPPLIERS, SUPPLIER TIERS AND DEALER NETWORKS IN ORDER TO REDUCE CYCLE TIME, TO MINIMIZE SYSTEM COSTS AND TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF GOODS OR SERVICES EXCHANGED AMONG THE MANUFACTURERS, SUPPLIERS AND DEALER NETWORKS, AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF UNIFYING AND EXTENDING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR SUPPLIERS, SUPPLIER TIERS AND DEALER NETWORKS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE RELATIONS AND TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATIONS VIA ELECTRONIC COMMERCEACTIVE—
035On-line services which facilitate electronic commerce by enabling users to locate buyers and sellers for the purpose of conducting business transactions and coordinating orders in connection therewith, and electronic commerce services via a global computer network in the nature of storing and processing engineering information, purchasing information, product and merchant preferences and customer service information, none of the aforesaid services being directed to motor vehicle consumers or end users or otherwise relating to traditional automobile dealership services such as motor vehicle sales to consumers, or motor vehicle repair or maintenanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance