Drawing for FASTMOVIN

USPTO serial 75896948

FASTMOVIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTMOVIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin Jordan Harkins

KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE & TAYON PC5700 GRANITE PKWY STE 330PLANO, TX 75024-6608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications services, namely, telephone communication services; telephone voice messaging services; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile transmission; electronic store-and-forward messaging, electronic transmission of messages, and documents; personal communication services; ISDN services and audio teleconferencing; and providing multiple-user access to a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 4, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance