USPTO serial 75897005
SUGAR & ROCKETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUGAR & ROCKETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald P. Kananen
RONALD P KANANEN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLCLION BLDGSTE 501 1233 20TH STWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUGAR & ROCKETS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |