USPTO serial 75897006
POLYPHONY DIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYPHONY DIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald P. Kananen
RONALD P KANANEN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLCLION BLDG STE 5011233 20TH STWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT OF VIDEO-GAME SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS FOR COMPUTER GAMES, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE DESIGN, MAINTENANCE OF VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, AND RECOVERY OF COMPUTER DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POLYPHONY DIGITAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |