USPTO serial 75897017
SUPPLYMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPPLYMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kanagawa-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Halsey, Jr
JOHN C GARVEY STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | OUTSOURCING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, PARTICULARLY OPERATING, CONTROLLING AND MANAGING COMPUTERIZED AND ONLINE ORDERING SYSTEMS FOR PURCHASING OFFICE SUPPLIES AND BOOKING SEATS AND HOTELS FOR BUSINESS TRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING WEBSITES AND ONLINE SEARCHABLE DATABASES ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORKS IN WHICH CUSTOMER COMPANIES AND OFFICE SUPPLIES PROVIDERS AND TRAVEL AGENTS PROVIDING RESERVATION SERVICES OF SEATS AND HOTELS FOR BUSINESS TRIPS MEET AND AGREE AS TO THE PROCUREMENT AND PURCHASE OF SUCH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FOR SUCH CUSTOMER COMPANIES' USE AND BENEFIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |