USPTO serial 75897025
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BETH M GOLDMAN
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing web-based access to an e-commerce catalog and electronic ordering functionality to facilitate the sale of merchandise via the global computer communications network; business management services in the field of e-commerce and on-line retail sales; facilitating the online sale of office supplies, office products, computers and computer related supplies and products, furniture and other merchandise via the global computer communications network; providing a complete web-based online ordering system for use in e-commerce, including website design, creation and operation of online catalogs and search engines, customized shopping lists and bundles, an online ordering system, multi-tier order approval processes and records management system enabling compilation and reporting of records of prior purchases and other data | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 042 | hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |