USPTO serial 75897045
SCOUTSTATUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCOUTSTATUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY J SHIMEK
AMY J SHIMEK PERKINS COIE LLP1029 W 3RD AVESTE 300ANCHORAGE, AK 99501-1970Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG MEMBER YOUTH ORIENTED ORGANIZATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS, THEIR MEMBERS AND INTERESTED PARTIES CONCERNING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION REGARDING YOUTH ORIENTED ORGANIZATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING A SEARCHABLE DATABASE FOR USE BY YOUTH ORIENTED ORGANIZATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS AND THEIR MEMBERS FOR OBTAINING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION REGARDING YOUTH ORIENTED ORGANIZATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |