USPTO serial 75897121
SUPER DUPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2817701Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPER DUPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
AVENTURA, FL
AVENTURA, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAUREN A DIENES
ERICA K DORAN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF ERICA K DORAN ESQ42 CHURCH STSYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, COSMETICS, AND SKIN TREATMENTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN ENHANCEMENT TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, FACIAL MASKS, SKIN CAMOUFLAGE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; EYE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, EYE CREAMS, EYE GELS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYEBROW PENCILS, MASCARAS, CONCEALERS, EYEBROW POWDERS, EYE LASHES, EYE LINER POWDERS, EYE LINER LIQUIDS, LIP TREATMENTS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, LIP PENCILS, LIP GLOSS; SKIN FOUNDATIONS; FACE POWDERS; BLUSHES, BLEACH CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; BODY BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY CLEANSERS, HAND CREAMS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY OILS; NAIL CREAMS, GELS, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; FOOT CREAMS, GELS, SCRUB, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AJR Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by AJR Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by AJR Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by RAR BEAUTY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RAR BEAUTY LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SUPER DUPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |