USPTO serial 75897343
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY REDHAWKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEATTLE UNIVERSITY REDHAWKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devon W. Ryning
PAUL L HAVEL MILLER NASH LLP601 UNION ST STE 4400SEATTLE, WA 98101-2352UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seattle University
- Other trademarks owned by Seattle University
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SEATTLE UNIVERSITY REDHAWKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |