USPTO serial 75897674
ORBADISC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORBADISC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward C. Meagher
EDWARD C MEAGHER DILWORTH & BARRESE333 EARLE OVINGTON BLVDUNIONDALE, NY 11553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | MECHANICAL CONVEYOR SYSTEM FOR USE ON BOATS, TRUCKS, TRAILERS AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES COMPRISING BELT CONVEYORS, METALLIC CONVEYOR BELTS, TURRETS, HEAVY LIFTING HOISTS, POWER-OPERATED LOADING PLATFORMS AND LIFTING BEDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |