USPTO serial 75897755
TRENDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRENDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Farrell
PAUL J FARRELL DILWORTH & BARRESE LLP333 EARLE OVINGTON BLVDUNIONDALE, NY 11553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | incandescent electric light bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; fluorescent electric light bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; novelty electric light bulbs, namely, black light bulbs and transparent colored bulbs, and electric lighting fixtures and bases therefor; black light fluorescent lighting tubes, and electric lighting fixtures therefor; novelty electric lamps and lights, namely, strobe lights, rotating globe-shaped lamps with multicolored light, revolving dome lights, and table lamps; laser light projectors; and fog machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |