USPTO serial 75897844
LITTLE ACORNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITTLE ACORNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
2790JULIE A KATZ
JULIE A KATZ WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BANNERS, BARBECUE MITTS, BATH LINEN, FABRIC BATH MATS, BED BLANKETS, BED LINENS, BED SHEETS, BED SPREADS, BOLTING CLOTH, DISH CLOTHS, COMFORTERS, DUVET COVERS, MATTRESS COVERS, UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE COVERS, CURTAIN FABRIC, DAMASK, DOLLIES, DRAPERIES, DUST RUFFLES, BIDERDOWNS, FEET CLOTH, FLANNEL, HANDKERCHIEFS, JERSEY FABRIC, LINEN, NYLON, OVEN MITTS, PATTERNS, PILLOW CASES, POLYESTER FABRIC, POT HOLDERS, QUILTS, RAMIE FABRIC, RAYON FABRIC, RUNNERS, SHAMS, SHOWER CURTAINS, TAFFETA, TOWELS, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC, VELVET WASH CLOTHS, WINDOW CURTAINS, WOOLEN FABRICS | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |