Drawing for 911.NET

USPTO serial 75898002

911.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2551269Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2002
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with 911.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon E. R. Troy

Gordon E.R. Troy, Esq.P.O. Box 368Charlotte, VT 30004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communication services, namely telephone, wireless, and global computer network communications for identifying and notifying a designated population of an impending emergency situation; Communication services, namely electronic communication and information systems that facilitate access to and use of emergency information by emergency administration personnel, public service access providers, public safety agencies, and commercial firms providing emergency services; telecommunications gateway services, namely computerized 911 support, coordination, call generation and voice messagingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 15, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 26, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 19, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 25, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 15, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
May 10, 2002PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 30, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 27, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 7, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance