USPTO serial 75898005
PARAWIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARAWIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence A. Weinberger
LAURENCE A WEINBERGER882 S MATLACK ST STE 103P O BOX 1663WEST CHESTER, PA 19380-0053Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric fans, portable electric heaters, and household electric air cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |