USPTO serial 75898071
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lyons/Lavey/Nickel/Swift, Inc.
New York, NY
Lyons/Lavey/Nickel/Swift, Inc.
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Lyons/Lavey/Nickel/Swift, Inc.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN KOMEN
EDWIN KOMEN Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP11th Floor East1300 I Street NWWashington, DC 20005-3314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DRUG INFORMATION OUTSOURCING SERVICES PROVIDED ON BEHALF OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN THE FIELD OF DRUG AND MEDICAL INFORMATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROVIDED ON BEHALF OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN THE FIELD OF DRUG AND MEDICAL INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DRUG AND MEDICAL INFORMATION CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, DRUG INFORMATION DATABASES AND DIRECTORIES, MEDICAL LETTERS AND REPORTS, MEDICAL LITERATURE REVIEWS, MEDIA SURVEILLANCE, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF DRUG INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING PROVIDED ON BEHALF OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |