USPTO serial 75898157
JOHN-JOHN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOHN-JOHN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-85055 lngolstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Bennett Mullinax
J BENNETT MULLINAX DORITY & MANNING, PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME PREPARATIONS, NAMELY PERFUMED CREAMS FOR THE BODY AND SCENTED FRAGRANCES; AROMATHERAPY OILS; PRODUCTS FOR BODY AND BEAUTY CARE, NIAMEY BEAUTY MASKS AND SKIN CREAMS; HAIR LOTIONS; SOAP; TOOTH CLEANING PRODUCTS, NAMELY TOOTH GEL AND TOOTH PASTE; HAIR WASHING AND CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS; SKIN CLEANING AND CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY SHOWER GELS; PRODUCTS FOR PERFUMERY, NAMELY EAU DE TOILETTE AND PERFUME; AND SHAVING LOTIONS AND COLOGNE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |