Drawing for RAMM

USPTO serial 75898201

RAMM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAMM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Grzelak

JASON M RHODES DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT1420 FIFTH AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic surgical equipment; namely, apparatus and containers, namely, mixing bowls, mixing and dispensing cartridges, mixing and dispensing containers, support bases, vacuum pumps, mixing blades, nozzles and tips for preparing and delivering bone cement, including bone cement mixing apparatus, vacuum pumps, bone cement delivery guns, delivery nozzles and disposable components, namely, mixing bowls, mixing and dispensing cartridges, mixing and dispensing containers, support bases, vacuum pumps, mixing blades, nozzles and tipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance