Drawing for ILAB

USPTO serial 75898230

ILAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne B Bochinski

P O BOX 375CANTON, CT 06019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005VITAMINS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; MINERALS AND HERBS IN THE FORM OF TABLETS, CAPSULES, POWDERS AND LIQUIDS FOR USE AS DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; INGREDIENTS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, NAMELY VITAMINS, HERBS AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS CONTAINING ANTIOXIDANTS, AMINO ACIDS, ELECTROLYTES AND METABOLITES; HERBAL NUTRICEUTICALS FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT AND NATURAL HOMEOPATHIC PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ASTHMA, DIABETES, FATIGUE AND ALLERGIES; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED FOR ATHLETES, NAMELY PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS, POWDERS, AND LIQUID DRINKS FOR USE AS MEAL REPLACEMENTS, FAT REDUCERS, FAT BURNERS, APPETITE SUPPRESSANTS ENERGY SUPPLEMENTS, AND NATURAL MUSCLE BUILDING SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE TILE NATURE OF AN ENERGY BOOSTER CHEWING GUM CONTAINING VITAMINS AND MINERALS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF NON-MEDICATED LOZENGES CONTAINING VITAMINS AND MINERALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 25, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 18, 2002REINREINSTATED
Apr 9, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance