USPTO serial 75898294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Henderson, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Kenehan
JOHN C LAMBERTSEN KENEHAN & LAMBERTSEN LTD1771 E FLAMINGO RD STE 117-BLAS VEGAS, NV 89119UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing real time interactive computer databases featuring the exchange of information by students, colleges, universities and employers regarding employment, internships, college and university requirements via a global computer network; providing search engines for obtaining data on internships and employment opportunities via a global computer network; and providing links to other sites, including loan calculators, resume and cover letter writing assistance, moving resources, online discussions, and co-promotions between companies, students and graduates | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |