USPTO serial 75898490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Road Town, Tortola, VG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
ANTHONY V LUPO ARCNT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN,PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals; transmission of voice, video and data by fibre optic networks; computer aided transmission of messages and images, providing electronic mail; providing an on-line chat room for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the fields of herbal and traditional medicine ; providing on-line message boards for computer users via a global computer network in the field of herbal and traditional medicine; providing electronic mailing lists that distribute information regarding herbal and traditional medical; providing electronic mailing lists that distribute information regarding and herbal and traditional medical treatments via a global computer information network; providing on-line calendaring services for others via global computer network; providing electronic exchange of information services in the services in the field of traditional medicine, herbs, vitamins, minerals, healthcare, fitness, diet and nutrition related issues via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |