USPTO serial 75898735
INTERNETHUB1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNETHUB1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
81735 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sima Singadia Kulkarni
SIMA SINGADIA KULKARNI KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP2400 MONARCH TWR3424 PEACHTREE RD N EATLANTA, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | management consulting, marketing, procurement of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods, negotiation and settlement of commercial transactions for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer programming, in particular installing and starting up market places/platforms, drawing up concepts for shop-solutions, drawing up and opening concepts in the business-to- business-trade, establishing and installing E-shops, programming and testing security software, firewall testing, consultation about security tests, installing and conducting security tests, project support concerning standard software and programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |