USPTO serial 75898783
ASPENTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASPENTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre'
John L. DuPre' Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.530 Virginia Road, P.O. Box 9133Concord, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants, offered with and without user manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | User manuals for use in connection with computer software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing information, and providing information via global computer networks, in the field of operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and lectures in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants and in the field of software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants; providing information in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants, and providing information in the field of chemical engineering; providing information via global computer networks in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants, and providing information via global computer networks in the field of chemical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASPENTECH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |