USPTO serial 75898790
ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS AND BUJOLDFOURTH FL500 N COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants, offered with and without user manuals user manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | user manuals for use in connection with computer software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education services, namely, providing seminars and lectures in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services with respect to simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants and with respect to software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants; educational services, namely, seminars and lectures in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants; information services in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants and in the field of chemical engineering; information services provided via a global computer in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants and in the field of chemical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |