USPTO serial 75898791
ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre'
John L. DuPre' Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, P.C.530 Virginia Road, P.O. Box 9133Concord, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants, offered with and without user manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | User manuals for use in connection with computer software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing seminars and lectures in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants and in the field of software for use in simulating, modeling, designing, optimizing, operating and managing process manufacturing plants; providing information in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants, and providing information in the field of chemical engineering; providing information via global computer networks in the field of software for use in process manufacturing and in the field of simulating, modeling, designing, and optimizing process manufacturing plants, and providing information via global computer networks in the field of chemical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASPENTECH PROCESS. TO THE POWER OF E.
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |