USPTO serial 75899033
NETENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P Bridges
TRADEMARK DOCKET, RICHARD NESSARY WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications hardware for transmitting voice, video and data via electronic communications networks, digital subscriber lines (DSL), and other high bandwidth lines, and for accessing and connecting to electronic communications networks; data networking telecommunications hardware; broadband networking telecommunications hardware; telecommunications hardware, namely routers and bridges; computer software allowing interoperability among otherwise incompatible telecommunications hardware and software; computer software for controlling and managing voice, video and data traffic over electronic communications networks, digital subscriber lines (DSL), and other high bandwidth lines; instruction manuals sold as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |