USPTO serial 75899157
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. David LaRiviere
F DAVID LARIVIERE LARIVIERE, GRUBMAN & PAYNE, LLPPO BOX 314019 UPPER RAGSDALE DR STE 200MONTEREY, CA 93942| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship services featuring replacement products for power conditioning devices and electrical and electromagnetic cables and connectors | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |