Drawing for M-TRADING

USPTO serial 75899204

M-TRADING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with M-TRADING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Roxanne Elings

G ROXANNE ELINGS SUDIPTA RAOGREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer program that enables users to trade securities, electronically, by voice or data, via the global computer networkACTIVE—
036Providing users of mobile telephones, wireless communications devices, and hand-held electronic organizers and computing devices with access to securities brokerage and securities trading services via the global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance