USPTO serial 75899324
ALLDYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLDYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Pugh
ROBERT J PUGH ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED1000 SIX PPG PLPITTSBURGH, PA 15085UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Alloy and metal aggregate compositions in both solid and powder form for further manufacture; and metals in various product forms intended for tool and die manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | cutting tools, tool blanks and tool bits for power-operated machines for milling, drilling, turning, and threading | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Welding electrodes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ATI Properties Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ATI Properties Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ALLDYNE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |