USPTO serial 75899478
MOTOGLOBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2806845Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2004
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOTOGLOBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW L. GOLDSTEIN
ANDREW L. GOLDSTEIN Freeborn & Peters LLP311 South Wacker DriveSuite 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6677Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | arranging travel tours on motorcycles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lotus Consulting Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FitzRich, Inc.,
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named MOTOGLOBAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |