USPTO serial 75899724
PRINTLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRINTLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ness Tziona, 7400, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAULA J KRASNY
PAULA J KRASNY PRUDENTIALBAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH ST STE 3700CHICAGO, IL 60601-6342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING AND REPRODUCTION AND DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING AND REPRODUCTION VIA THE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS, MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, GREETING CARDS, CALENDARS, NOT PAPER, BROCHURES, POSTERS, PRINTED ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS, AND OTHER PRINTED MATTER CONTAINING DIGITAL IMAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | SERVICES RELATED TO PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING AND REPRODUCTION AND DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING AND REPRODUCTION VIA THE INTERNET, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC IMAGING, SCANNING, DIGITIZING, ALTERATION, AND RETOUCHING OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPUTER IMAGING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |