USPTO serial 75899810
ACOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
00168 Rome, IT
00168 Rome, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D. SHEWCHUK
JEFFREY D SHEWCHUK KINNEY & LANGE PATHE KINNEY & LANGE BLDG 312 S THIRD STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic Recording Apparatus; Electronic apparatus for transmission of telephone messages; electronic apparatus for cellular telephone communications; electronic apparatus for computer aided transmission of messages; electronic apparatus for news agencies communication by computer terminals, electronic mail and facsimile transmissions | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telephone services for transmissions of messages; telephone services for cellular telephone communications; computer aided transmission of messages; services for rental of message sending apparatus; news agency communications by computer terminals, electronic mail and facsimile transmissions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |