USPTO serial 75900317
CITIHOMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITIHOMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, ASSISTING IN THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY; PROVIDING A DATABASE OF REAL ESTATE INFORMATION, NAMELY, REAL ESTATE LISTING INFORMATION; PROVIDING A DIRECTORY OF REAL ESTATE AGENTS | ABANDONED | Jul 10, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |