Drawing for RELEVANT INFORMATION

USPTO serial 75900775

RELEVANT INFORMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELEVANT INFORMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven L. Permut

STEVEN L PERMUT REISING ETHINGTON BARNES ET ALP O BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099-4390UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016reference Books and information sheets on consumer health, business to business contacts, city and travel information, bio-graphics, holidays and festivals, geography, government programs, government contactsACTIVE—
041Electronic and on-line publication services, namely; publication of text and graphic works of others on consumer health, business to business contacts, city and travel information, bio-graphics, holidays and festivals, geography, government programs, government contactsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance