USPTO serial 75900834
VCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micah D. Stolowitz
LINDA G ALVAREZ VINSON & ELKINS LLP2300 FIRST CITY TWR1001 FANNIN STHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic coded prepaid account cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Vending machine services featuring prepaid account cards, and customer care services, namely, support services to handle lost or nonfunctional credit cards and to answer customer questions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Pre-payment services, namely, converting cash into electronic currency for use in subsequent purchases of goods, services, or bill payment; providing electronic accounts for payment of goods, services, or bills on-line; financial services, namely, banking services and bill payment services; on-line financial services, namely, banking services and on-line bill payment services; credit card, electronic credit card, and debit card transaction processing; acceptance of cash and equivalent payments at brick-and-mortar locations to establish or recharge an account for online transactions; acceptance of pre-payment for the purchase of telecommunications services; telephone calling card services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PreNet Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PreNet Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named VCARD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |