Drawing for STAR LITE CLASS T BY INTERSIL

USPTO serial 75900860

STAR LITE CLASS T BY INTERSIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAR LITE CLASS T BY INTERSIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. Lawton Rogers, III

L LAWTON ROGERS III DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST NWSTE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radiation hardened integrated circuits, namely, circuits containing transistors or other semiconductor devices used in circuits for wireless communications, electronic networks, digital and analog electronic circuits, microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors, programmable logic circuits, memory circuits, power control circuits, amplifiers and power converters, analog and digital converters; radiation hardened power semiconductors, namely, MOSFETS, IGBTS, and discrete transistors, thyristors, rectifiers, diodes and diode arrays; radiation hardened electronic circuit boards and assembled electronic modules containing said integrated circuits, all of the above goods for use in military and commercial satellite applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Mar 28, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 23, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance