Drawing for THE LOUIS L'AMOUR TRADING POST

USPTO serial 75901021

THE LOUIS L'AMOUR TRADING POST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOUIS L'AMOUR TRADING POST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing information in the field of clothing and general consumer merchandise via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 14, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 14, 2005CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 11, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2005CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 2, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance