USPTO serial 75901201
ARCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Gore
GREGORY J GORE70 W OAKLAND AVESTE 316DOYLESTOWN, PA 18901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE STORES FEATURING FASTENERS AND HARDWARE, NAMELY, METALLIC SELF CLINCHING FASTENERS, METAL RIVETS, METAL THREADED INSERTS, METAL HINGES, METAL LATCHES, NON-METALLIC SELF CLINCHING FASTENERS, NON-METAL RIVETS, NON-METAL THREADED INSERTS, PLASTIC CABLE TIES, NON-METAL HINGES, AND NON-METAL LATCHES, METAL PIPE CONNECTORS, LINEAR MOTION MACHINE PARTS MADE OF METAL, NAMELY, PRECISION SLIDES, ELECTRICAL CABLE SUPPORT SYSTEMS, NAMELY, CABLE TIES, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, PACKAGES FOR ELECTRONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, PLASTIC CIRCUIT BOARDS, NON-METAL RAILROAD TIES, AND SLIDE FASTENERS; INVENTORY LOGISTICS CONTROL SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND ELECTRONICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |