USPTO serial 75901209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Westchester, IL
KINNELON, NJ
KINNELON, NJ
KINNELON, NJ
OAKBROOK TERRACE, IL
TULSA, OK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Laurel V. Dineff WWIPPS, Inc.160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Italian gourmet foods, namely, cookies [, pasta sauces, spaghetti, lasagna, cannoli, pastas] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |