USPTO serial 75901243
CHAOSMUSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHAOSMUSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-5389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | electronic retailing services via computer featuring products of others, namely, music, video, multimedia products, computer hardware, computer software, computer programming and technology; business consultation in the field of computer programming and technology consultation; promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests; business management and consultation for others in the field of promoting, selling and supplying music and multimedia products and material; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer programming and computer consultation for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |