USPTO serial 75901317
MK AND A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MK AND A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Finkelstein
WILLIAM A FINKELSTEIN ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN4TH FL N TWR1620 26TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, COMPACTS, CONCEALERS, BLUSHES, MASCARAS, MAKE-UP (FOUNDATIONS), MAKE UP PENCILS, LIPSTICKS, EYESHADOW, EYE-LINERS, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL STENCILS, HARD ARTIFICIAL NAILS, ROUGES, SHAMPOOS, SKIN SOAPS, LIQUID SOAPS TOILET SOAPS; BATH ITEMS, NAMELY, BEADS, CRYSTALS, FOAM, GELS, OIL, PEARLS, POWDER, NON-MEDICATED SALTS, BUBBLE BATHS, SHOWER GEL; HAIR PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CONDITIONERS, GEL, LIGHTENERS, LOTIONS, MASCARA, MOUSSE, POMADES, RELAXERS, RELAXING PREPARATIONS, RINSES, SPRAY, STRAIGHTENING PREPARATIONS, STYLING PREPARATIONS, WAVING LOTION, HAIR DYES; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY MOISTURIZERS, BODY LOTIONS AND CREAMS; OILS, NAMELY, AROMATHERAPY OILS, BABY OIL, BATH OIL, BODY OIL, MASSAGE OIL PERFUME OIL AND SUNTAN OIL; PERFUMERY, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE AND TOILET WATER; AND LOTIONS, NAMELY, SUNTAN LOTION, SKIN, HAIR, FACIAL, BODY, HAIR WAVING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |