USPTO serial 75901518
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shelly L. McGee
SHELLY L MCGEE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS, NAMELY, SOAPS FOR BATHS, SOAPS FOR BEAUTY CARE, LIQUID SOAPS, TOILET SOAPS; HAIR SHAMPOOS; HAIR RINSES; FRAGRANCES, NAMELY, EAU DE COLOGNES, PERFUMES, LAVENDER OILS, CLOVE OILS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, HAIR GELS, MASSAGE GELS, MILK LOTIONS, SKIN LOTIONS, HAIR LOTIONS, BODY LOTIONS, SHAVING LOTIONS, VANISHING CREAMS, CLEANSING CREAMS, HAIR CREAMS, MEDICATED CREAMS, SCURF CREAMS, TOILET OILS, MASSAGE OILS, BATH OILS, SUN OILS, BABY OILS, MASK PACKS FOR THE FACE, SKIN, BODY AND HAIR, LIP CONDITIONERS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, SKIN FRESHENERS, HAIR TREATMENTS, SUN MILKS, SUNTAN CREAMS, SUNTAN LOTIONS, SUN SCREEN LOTIONS, SUN SCREEN CREAMS, HAND CREAMS, TALCUM POWDERS, BATH POWDERS, BABY POWDERS, HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR TONICS, HAIR MOUSSES; BATH EXTRACTS; BATH SALTS; BATH ESSENCES; FALSE NAILS; FALSE EYELASHES; ADHESIVES FOR WEARING FALSE EYELASHES; DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Beauty culture, namely, hairdressing; beauty treatments, beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services; consultation relating to beauty culture and hairdressing; providing information on beauty culture and hairdressing; providing bathing facilities; provision of information on fashion; design services, namely, fashion design, furniture design, personal ornaments and jewelry design, hair style design, and packaging design; design and testing of cosmetics for others; massage and acupressure, moxa cautery, reposition in judo, acupuncture; nutrition consultation; rental of clothes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |