USPTO serial 75901520
LEBEAUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEBEAUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shelly L. Mcgee
SHELLY L MCGEE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN2101 L STWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely, soaps for baths, soaps for beauty care, liquid soaps, toilet soaps; hair shampoos; hair rinses; fragrances, namely eau de cologne, perfumes, lavender oils, clove oils; cosmetics, namely, hair gels, massage gels, milk lotions, skin lotions, hair lotions, body lotions, shaving lotions, vanishing creams, cleansing creams, hair creams, scurf creams, toilet oils, massage oils, bath oils, sun oils, baby oils, mask packs for the face, skin, body and hair, lip conditioners, hair conditioners, skin fresheners, sun milks, suntan creams, suntan lotions, sun screen lotions, sun screen creams, hand creams, talcum powders, bath powders, baby powders, hair sprays, hair tonics, hair mousses; bath extracts and bath essences, namely, non-medicated bath agents that enhance relaxation and promote skin and body care; bath salts; false nails, false eyelashes; adhesives for wearing false eyelashes; and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management consultation relating to beauty shops, barbershops and aesthetic salons; conducting marketing research; employment agency services for beauticians, aestheticians and barbers/hairdressers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Teaching of beauty culture and hairdressing; teaching in the field of healthcare and fitness; providing seminars relating to beauty culture and hairdressing; sponsoring contests relating to beauty culture and hairdressing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Beauty culture, namely, hairdressing; beauty treatments, beauty salon services and aesthetic salon services; consultation relating to beauty culture and hairdressing; providing information on beauty culture and hairdressing; providing bathing facilities; provision of information on fashion; design services, namely, fashion design, furniture design, personal ornaments and jewelry design, hair style design, and packaging design; design and testing of cosmetics for others; massage and acupressure, moxa cautery, reposition in judo, acupuncture; nutrition consultation; rental of clothes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEBEAUST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |