USPTO serial 75901829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN M. SANVILLE
STEPHEN M SANVILLE LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS1700 BANK OF AMERICA PLZ300 S FOURTH STLAS VEGAS, NV 89101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Provision of travel agency services; airline transportation reservation services; arranging for the transportation and shipment of baggage of others; arranging and reserving transportation for others to and from various locations, namely hotels, lodgings, bed and breakfasts, vacations, cruises, tours, excursions, trade conventions and meetings, amusement parks, casinos, entertainment venues, museums, hiking trails, marinas, ski resorts, golf courses, sporting events and restaurants; arranging and conducting travel and sightseeing tours for others; arranging for the transportation of passengers and baggage to and from airports; provision of wholesale and retail travel services, namely airline transportation reservation services, travel agency services and tour agency services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |