Drawing for E-CLIENT

USPTO serial 75901992

E-CLIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-CLIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti

MARK J DILIBERTI FOLEY & LARDNERFIRSTAR CTR777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking services, namely, allowing customers to purchase banking products and access personal account information through a global communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance