USPTO serial 75901993
Serial No. 75901993
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298406Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75901993?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, DK
Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, DK
Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, DK
Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional business management consultation in the field of language interpretation; secretarial services in the field of language interpretation; providing language interpretation technology to third parties, namely, rental of language -interpretation apparatus and instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Rental of communications apparatus and instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Rental of electronic audio and visual equipment for use in educational conferences, congresses, seminars, forums, symposiums and workshops in the field of language interpretation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer programming for others in the field of language interpretation technology; rental of computer hardware and computer software to others in the field language interpretation technology; maintenance, updating and design of computer software for others in the field of language interpretation technology; computer systems analysis for others in the field of language interpretation technology; technical assistance in connection with conferences, namely, technical consultation relating to facilities, audio-visual equipment and sound systems for conferences, congresses, seminars, forums, symposiums and workshops requiring communication or interpretation services all in the field of language interpretation; interpretation services, namely, providing language interpreters for conferences, congresses, seminars, forums, symposiums and workshops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Informationsteknik Scandinavia A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |