USPTO serial 75902165
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Campbell, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R Triber
YANO L RUBINSTEIN PERKINS COIE LLP101 JEFFERSON DRMENLO PARK, CA 94025-1114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video processing equipment, namely video disc players and recorders, videocassette recorders, direct-to-home digital satellite television receivers, video line doublers, home theater audio/video receivers, home theater video switchers, digital television receivers, digital television set-top boxes, direct-view enhanced analog television receivers, home theater video projectors, digital cable set-top boxes, computer video display/monitors, electronic cinema projectors, personal computers, personal computer video displays, personal video displays namely head-mounted and other wearable video displays, and automotive, airline and other mobile video entertainment displays | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |