USPTO serial 75902173
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE INTEGRATION OF APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATION OF BUSINESS PROCESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENTERPRISE APPLICATION INTEGRATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING AND ACCELERATING INTEGRATION PROJECTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS AND RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATION OF APPLICATIONS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATION OF BUSINESS PROCESSES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENTERPRISE APPLICATION INTEGRATION, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING AND ACCELERATING INTEGRATION PROJECTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |