USPTO serial 75902426
SMART PADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART PADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
Arlington Heights, IL
Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
Arlington Heights, IL
Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
Arlington Heights, IL
Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
Peter M. de Jonge Thorpe North and Western, LLP.8180 South 700 East, Ste 350Sandy, UT 84070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | SPORTS FLOORING COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SHOCK ABSORBING PADDING MADE OF RECYCLED RUBBER FOR CUSHIONING WOODEN SPORTS FLOORING | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Connor Sports Flooring Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CONNOR SPORTS FLOORING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SMART PADS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |